reedmaniac.com

Laying on My Back and Enjoying the Internet

Excuse the length of this entry, but there are quite a number of things to get out and I have not really posted in a while. Whee!

...

Thanks to a certain level of overzealousness in my nature, I am recovering from an injured back right now. I woke up a little sore yesterday and because of my right knee being a bit angsty after a run on Sunday, I decided that heading to Reed and using one of their rowing machines would be ideal. Less impact on the joints, slightly more efficient exercise. Not outside, but at least there was Comedy Central.

Pulled a few muscles. Somehow. Not sure how, as I was not doing anything too strenuous and did a few minutes of warming up as well as the two mile bike ride to Reed beforehand. After getting home, it felt like a crowbar had been smashed into the middle of my back. This morning it felt more like a baseball bat was used. And this afternoon, we're all the way to heavy toddler dropped on me. By tomorrow I should be on the level of an achy back from too much sleep.

The upside is that I have caught up on all of my Netflix watching, finished a book, and all of those bookmarked links from the past two links are now read. The downside is that I really needed to go grocery shopping on Monday and now might have to have cinnamon rolls for dinner. Wait, that might be an upside.

...

Two weekends ago, I joined Cameron on a Portland Parks & Recreation Mt. Hood climbing trip. Back when I first returned to PDX late this spring, I mentioned to a few friends that if any of them wanted to climb Hood, I would be more than willing to head up again and take in the view with them. Of all of the peaks in the Pacific Northwest, Mt. Hood has always had the most enjoyable and scenic views (in my opinion) and with the least amount of effort. Cameron said yes, so I made good and joined him for the entire trip.

Doug Ironside and Rodney Sofich were both leading on this trip, and being my two favorite guides that just made the whole thing all the more pleasurable. Snow school was a breeze, as I have done enough technical climbs to do the basics in my sleep. Our snowcat up to the top of Pallmer was at the incredibly early hour of midnight, so I only knocked off for probably two or three hours of sleep after I changed rooms because of a snorer. The early snowcat also meant we had a total of five hours to get to the summit for sunrise. Almost twice the amount of time a fast climber would need to get there.

So, we ended up having an extremely leisurely climb all the way to Hogsback. Thanks to numerous people going up and coming down late in the morning and early afternoon of Saturday when the snow was soft, we had glorious steps, hardened over night. Hard to stay awake as we just slipped into our groove. I was yawning something fierce for the first couple hours, and if you look at the photo of Cameron and I on the summit, I give the distinct impression of having just woken up.

The summit was lovely. We were the first ones to the top, although another group was right on our tails and more than once I wanted to smack the girl leading them as her group was obviously just following us and had at least 25 feet of rope between each member to the point of it being worthless as any manner of safety with the slack and inability to communicate. The entire climb up at that time of day could have been done without rope and probably would have been safer.

The way down was a different story. Rodney counted nearly 200 people climbing up that day, and the majority followed our route up the Old Chute (Mazama route) so there was quite the traffic jam. Instead of going down that way, like the aforementioned group behind us did while another group was trying to come up, we went further along the summit ridge and down a slightly more eastern chute. Cameron took an excellent shot of me as I led our group along the ridge to this chute:

Paul along Summit Ridge


While lacking the traffic jam, the snow on our chosen descent route provided less certain steps as it had a couple inches of old, windswept, brittle snow making our crampons less effective for gripping the mountain. There were some old steps down, probably from climbers at least a couple days previously, but half the time they were collapsing on me as the lead climber. Not the most comfortable conditions for people climbing down a mountain for the first time, so I asked Doug to put the group on a belay while we climbed down.

In retrospect, I think the belay may have been a bad call on my part. For the first thirty feet, it was extremely steep (50-55 degrees) and that made it seem prudent. I just imagined one member of our group slipping and with the poor condition of the snow for self arresting, there just seemed a good chance they would take everyone with them. Yet, being on belay while climbing down a steep slope brings about plenty of its own problems. The rope has to be kept tight and if the group is not moving as a cohesive organism, problems occur. One member of our group got a bit nervous and her legs were tired, so we had her trying to lay against the slope (crampons go out, you go down) and stopping to rest when the group really could not be stopping. All this made even worse by not being able to easily communicate with Doug, who was belaying us, about our difficulties. Frustrating. Tiring.

Except, Rodney went at a different angle, found better snow, and belayed his group all the way down. And despite having better snow, better ice axe positions, and walking backwards with all points of their crampons into the mountain, I saw two members of his group slip and fall during their descent. One rather dramatically. That seems to say to me I made the right choice in asking for the belay. Tough choices.

We all made it down though and I think everyone had a worthwhile experience. Afterwards, Cameron and I took Doug and Rodney out for a mid-morning breakfast and chewed the fat for an hour. I recall hoovering a whole plate of French Toast in about two minutes and then looking around confused wondering where it had all gone; I was still famished. Good climb.

...

Call it cynicism. Call it boredom. By golly, call it disinterest, but I simply do not care about Obama's campaign or that he is running for President. I do care that so many people are invested in his campaign so blindly though. There are so many people I have met who support him for no other reason than an emotional belief that he will save the country from X. Others will simply spout off talking points about him, or spout off his campaign's criticisms against his opponent without taking a moment to see if they are even true. Really, for me, who really likes a strong foundation of rational thinking in his politics, it is maddening.

Populist rhetoric is never what you should believe. A new kind of politics? Change you can believe in? Hope? A strong, uncompromising vision of a safe, diplomatic, liberal country? Go fuck yourself, America you damn irrational, unthinking Americans, if you believe that Barack Obama is not a calculating politician who will break promises to his loyal followers when it suits his needs and desires. Principles are the first thing to go in politics.

Negative ads. Free Trade. Cutting Corporate Taxes. Rejecting Public Financing. FISA. Telecomm Immunity.

Not saying I disagree with his position on these either (although I mostly do), or that I think he is a bad candidate, or that I would not vote for him in the general election (still undecided on whether to vote for a third party candidate). Simply that I am rather tired of Obama supporters being either a) surprised by his actions; b) apologists, who try to explain his actions away; c) not even paying attention and supporting him anyway. Obama is a politician. Treat him as such. Blind faith in a politician or government only gets you into trouble.

...

Not sure how I got directed to this article but Staying Smart in Dumbed-Down Times was well worth the read. And not because her conclusions are well formed and valid. In fact, rereading it just now, I have a hard time agreeing with many of her points. That is where the comments come in. They are fascinating! Their range, depth, exploration, challenging the article's points one by one, and even the absurdity brought into play had me reading every single one. If anything, it provides not only a feedback to the article but actually live criticism my other academics. Makes me love the internet.

...

Having read Neil Gaiman's journal today, he posted this disturbing article from the LA Times:

U.S. Courts have ruled, as recently as this spring in a case stemming from a search at LAX, that there's no need for warrants or suspicions when a person is seeking to enter the country because any "routine search" is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. In effect, it's like luggage: anything and everything in your laptop, cellphone, BlackBerry or digital camera can be examined and copied by U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents.


The LA Times article links to this analysis of that recent case on law.com. The juicy part:

"We are satisfied that reasonable suspicion is not needed for customs officials to search a laptop or other personal electronic storage devices at the border," Judge Diarmuid O'Scannlain wrote.


Think that over for a moment. Whenever you come into the United States from another country, your laptop can be opened up and looked through by any customs official without reason. They can take snapshots of your hard drive, if they deem it necessary. Seems, oh, I don't know, a little scary?
– Posted: June 26, 2008, 02:34 pm
8 Responses to Laying on My Back and Enjoying the Internet

Commenting has been disabled for this entry...

hmm, I am an Obama supporter and could spat off plenty of reasons I support him that go far beyond talking points, but no need as it seems like your mind is made up (Obama supporters don’t go deep).  Fair enough, but I ask you one favor… as a person who has a mother that has risked a great deal for this fiasco we call “Operation Iraqi Freedom,” please consider the troops and their families.  After 15 months in Iraq during 06-07, my mother now spends her days counseling troops who are trying to cope with their disabilities and transition back into this society.  If you can find no other reason to say positive things about a campaign that has been so uplifting for millions, at least consider it for single fact that Obama’s presidency may be our only hope to bring our troops home.  It’s time.

By on June 26, 2008, 09:41 pm

@Stephen Slater (a.k.a. Obama above) - Once again someone sees one complaint against some as an absolute complaint against all.  I never said all Obama supporters don’t go deep.  I said that I am tired of those who are following blindly, those who are not being realistic about a politician and paying attention to his actions, not his words.

I did not say that I disagree with his positions on everything. Instead, that not an insignificant number of important positions he told his supporters he had a few months ago are now changed or ignored.  And, if you think Obama’s presidency may be our only hope for ending Iraq, then you are wrong.  We have a Congress.  A Congress, not an executive branch, whose job it is to fund and declare wars.  Putting hope on one man, a politician who has already broken important promises?  That is absolutely folly.

Oh, and for the record, I have a sister and two friends over in Iraq, so perhaps you might go jump off you high mindedness and at least post your name with your comment.  Thanks.

By on June 26, 2008, 09:54 pm

Relax.  I don’t need you to tell me what name to post.  You can see my name in my damn email.  geez.

There was no reason for you to go off.  I did not imply that you disagreed with his positions.  When you tell america to fuck off for your own obscure reasoning, you invite comments such as mine.  I asked you for a favor.  It was a simple request for a little consideration about something I had no idea whether or not you had thought about… but requested that you do (excuse me).  High mindedness?  I guess… must take one to know one.

And if you are going to get your panties in a wad, at least do so while not distorting what I said.  I did NOT say Obama may end the war.  I did not put it on one man.  I suggested the war would have a better chance of ending under an “Obama presidency.” I said, “It may be our only hope to bring our troops home.” This would include getting his administration and policies in place which should go without saying that it’s not just one person.  It appears you just want to paint with a broad brush. 

No wonder your cynical if you think we can find hope to end this war in congress.

Is this how you handle most discussions with Obama supporters?  Accuse them of seeing one complaint as a complaint against all?  I don’t think the accusation fits.  You clearly painted Obama as a calculated politician willing to say and do anything yada yada yada.  Thats a complaint that is debatable, not to mention you had more than one complaint in your original rhetoric.  Then you have the gall to link to an opinion article that references republican talking points (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3Zy50Dy6Zk).  Give me a break.  If you watch/read/listen to the bloggers, msm, pundits, etcetera, who sensationalize everything, no wonder you have lost interest or bored.  While I don’t agree with Obama on everything (ex: FISA), I agree with him enough to throw my support behind him.  If you only vote your principles then you may as well not vote. You’ll never find a match.

By on June 26, 2008, 11:03 pm

It is not for me, Stephen, it is for people who read this site and want to know to who they are talking.  I, for one, like to know who I am reading in a conversation.  Not only I read this website, surprisingly…

I did not go off, I replied to your comment.  Think of my tone as exasperated.  Remember tone does not come across in just text.  No, you did not imply, but I wanted to clarify that I do not.  I thought my reasoning was pretty plain.  Those who believe his campaign and campaign slogans so blindly need to go fuck off and think about who they are supporting.  And yes, I am high minded.  Extremely.

I don’t wear panties.  (Although, I have heard good things.) Who is in charge of his Presidency?  Who makes the final big decisions?  Obama.  You are putting that “only” on him.  That is not a broad stroke, that is a specific point.  He’s the man in charge, the one who history will point to.

How is it cynical putting my hope on Congress?  They are the ones who give the money.  They are the ones who declare war.  They are our representatives.  Their power is supposed to balance the President’s.  That is not cynicism.  That is believing in democracy, the Constitution, and the people.  That’s hope.

Yes, he is a calculated politician.  And yes, I do believe it is debatable how much of what he does is his true beliefs and how much that is to get elected.  The Republicans are not always wrong.  Further, I actually don’t have a problem with him being such a politician, nor with him changing his views or positions.  My problem is with those of his supporters who follow him blindly and as if he is the second coming of Lincoln/Kennedy/whomever.

“If you only vote your principles then you may as well not vote. You’ll never find a match.”

Let’s be clear.  I will always vote with my principles.  I will vote for what I believe.  For the direction I think the country should go.  Not for the most electable. Not for someone who is just not the other guy.  If Obama is the closest I can get to that, then he gets my vote.  If it is a third party, then I vote for them.  Not so much the kind of person to compromise.

By on June 26, 2008, 11:30 pm

I pretty much agree with everything you said all the way down to your response in regards to voting your principles.  You said it best:

“If Obama is the closest I can get to that, then he gets my vote.”

That was exactly my point.  The key word being “closest.” I have to admit though, Dennis Kucinich was almost a perfect match with my principles. 

Anyway, I always enjoy reading your entries.  Keep it up and good luck!

Yes we can! ;)

By on June 27, 2008, 03:54 am

And my point is that we should not trust any politician, any President.  We must always be critical, always examining their actions.  Those who do not are fools.

Only one person matches my principles entirely, and he sadly is not running.  Might write his name in though.

Thanks.

By on June 27, 2008, 09:13 am

I think I’m going to create a TrueCrypt partition for the majority of my personal data.  With TrueCrypt you can even include a “distress” level partition if you’re forced to give up your password.  I’m starting to feel like a secret agent!

By on June 27, 2008, 11:26 am

“And my point is that we should not trust any politician, any President.  We must always be critical, always examining their actions.  Those who do not are fools.”

Same goes with religion and all other areas of life. I couldn’t agree more. Well said.

By on June 29, 2008, 05:14 pm
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.